This study explores the perceptions of secondary school teacher trainees regarding assessment practices in blended learning programs. The research was conducted with participants from two Italian universities, the Univer-sity of Milan and the University of Molise, who were enrolled in initial training courses that combine online theoretical lectures with in-person laboratory and internship activities. The purpose of this research was to understand how partic-ipants perceive the assessment practices in these programs, which, according to ministerial decree, include only a final written test and a simulated lesson. An exploratory study was carried out using an anonymous, semi-structured question-naire distributed online thanks to Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) methodology. The questionnaire collected 614 validated responses and the analy-sis we propose concerns four key areas: the ideal timing for assessment, preferred assessment methods, the value of specific assessment features, and participants’ motivational orientation toward the training. Results indicate that while many students favored final assessments, a significant portion also advocated for con-tinuous assessment. Reasons included cognitive benefits, better workload man-agement, and formative feedback opportunities. Participants considered practical simulations and oral exams most effective for developing competencies. They also highly valued feedback and self-assessment, rating them as more beneficial for learning than the final exam grade. These findings reveal a wide range of motivations among trainees, from a desire for quick completion to a focus on in-depth professional development. Significant correlations exist between moti-vational orientation and preference for certain assessment types, such as project development.

Assessment Perception in Blended Learning Pathway: An Exploratory Study in Secondary School Teacher Training

Andrea Garavaglia
Formal Analysis
;
Livia Petti
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2026-01-01

Abstract

This study explores the perceptions of secondary school teacher trainees regarding assessment practices in blended learning programs. The research was conducted with participants from two Italian universities, the Univer-sity of Milan and the University of Molise, who were enrolled in initial training courses that combine online theoretical lectures with in-person laboratory and internship activities. The purpose of this research was to understand how partic-ipants perceive the assessment practices in these programs, which, according to ministerial decree, include only a final written test and a simulated lesson. An exploratory study was carried out using an anonymous, semi-structured question-naire distributed online thanks to Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) methodology. The questionnaire collected 614 validated responses and the analy-sis we propose concerns four key areas: the ideal timing for assessment, preferred assessment methods, the value of specific assessment features, and participants’ motivational orientation toward the training. Results indicate that while many students favored final assessments, a significant portion also advocated for con-tinuous assessment. Reasons included cognitive benefits, better workload man-agement, and formative feedback opportunities. Participants considered practical simulations and oral exams most effective for developing competencies. They also highly valued feedback and self-assessment, rating them as more beneficial for learning than the final exam grade. These findings reveal a wide range of motivations among trainees, from a desire for quick completion to a focus on in-depth professional development. Significant correlations exist between moti-vational orientation and preference for certain assessment types, such as project development.
2026
978-3-032-31850-3
Assessment, blended learning, higher education
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12607/83385
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact