We performed a retrospective review of our database to evaluate surgical and functional outcomes in men undergoing radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) versus radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) after previous prostate surgery.Overall complete continence was achieved in 49 (83%), 51 (86.4%) and 55 (93.2%) RPP patients at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, versus 39 (66.1%), 42 (71.1%) and 47 (79.6%) RRP patients, respectively (p = 0.03, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). No significant difference was reported between the two groups in the overall percentage of preserved normal erectile function. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy in patients with previous prostate surgery should be performed with the transperineal rather than the retropubic approach.
Radical Perineal Prostatectomy versus Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy after Previous Prostate Surgery: Surgical and Functional Outcomes
MIRONE, VINCENZO
2011-01-01
Abstract
We performed a retrospective review of our database to evaluate surgical and functional outcomes in men undergoing radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) versus radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) after previous prostate surgery.Overall complete continence was achieved in 49 (83%), 51 (86.4%) and 55 (93.2%) RPP patients at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, versus 39 (66.1%), 42 (71.1%) and 47 (79.6%) RRP patients, respectively (p = 0.03, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). No significant difference was reported between the two groups in the overall percentage of preserved normal erectile function. Conclusions: Radical prostatectomy in patients with previous prostate surgery should be performed with the transperineal rather than the retropubic approach.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
