: In this commentary, we argue that Phillips et al.'s findings can be used to provide new important insights in the debate between externalists' theories of cognition. In particular, we claim that the results presented in this target article may offer us the conceptual palette needed for a sustained defence of an extended account of cognition over an enactive one.
Knowledge prior to belief: Is extended better than enacted?
Lavazza, Andrea
2021-01-01
Abstract
: In this commentary, we argue that Phillips et al.'s findings can be used to provide new important insights in the debate between externalists' theories of cognition. In particular, we claim that the results presented in this target article may offer us the conceptual palette needed for a sustained defence of an extended account of cognition over an enactive one.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
