Automatic movement recognition is often used to support various fields such as clinical, sports, and security. To date, there is a lack of a classification feature that is both interpretable and not movement-specific. Previous studies on motion analysis have shown that coordination properties extracted using network theory can describe specific movement characteristics, making coordination a potential feature for classification. Hence, we leveraged kinematic data from 168 individuals performing 30 different movements, published in an online dataset and compared features extracted using network theory (kinectomes) to the ones extracted using principal component analysis (PCA). The classification accuracy of the kinectome (0.99 ± 0.01) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of PCA (0.96 ± 0.04), but not significantly different from UMAP (0.98 ± 0.02, p = 0.314). Our results show that both kinectome- and UMAP-based features achieve high classification accuracy. However, kinectomes provide the key advantage of interpretability, enabling anatomically and functionally meaningful insights into movement patterns.

Artificial intelligence for automatic movement recognition: a network-based approach

Troisi Lopez, Emahnuel
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Minino, Roberta;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Automatic movement recognition is often used to support various fields such as clinical, sports, and security. To date, there is a lack of a classification feature that is both interpretable and not movement-specific. Previous studies on motion analysis have shown that coordination properties extracted using network theory can describe specific movement characteristics, making coordination a potential feature for classification. Hence, we leveraged kinematic data from 168 individuals performing 30 different movements, published in an online dataset and compared features extracted using network theory (kinectomes) to the ones extracted using principal component analysis (PCA). The classification accuracy of the kinectome (0.99 ± 0.01) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of PCA (0.96 ± 0.04), but not significantly different from UMAP (0.98 ± 0.02, p = 0.314). Our results show that both kinectome- and UMAP-based features achieve high classification accuracy. However, kinectomes provide the key advantage of interpretability, enabling anatomically and functionally meaningful insights into movement patterns.
2026
coordination
Movement recognition
network theory
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12607/82285
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact